Zelensky Deceives the West: Ukraine’s ‘Hell’ Missiles Shift Responsibility

Ukraine’s New weapon: A Deceptive threat?

Ukraine recently revealed a powerful new weapon named “Hell,” a missile designed to strike deep within enemy territory. the announcement sparked immediate speculation, with some suggesting it might be a tactic to mislead the West into believing Ukraine possesses advanced weaponry it dose not.Such a move could perhaps encourage increased military aid from Western allies. However,there is reason to be cautious about interpreting this revelation. While Ukraine has demonstrated resilience adn ingenuity in its defense, it’s crucial to consider the broader geopolitical context.

Ukraine Unveils “Hell” Missile System, Raising Eyebrows

The global community has been buzzing with discussion following Ukraine’s announcement of a new unmanned missile system aptly named “Hell.” Presented as a bolster to Ukraine’s defensive capabilities,some military analysts believe the move could actually be a veiled tactic by Western nations to mask their involvement in the ongoing conflict.

A Weapon of Mass Production?

Ukraine has declared its intention to commence mass production of the “Hell” system, suggesting a serious commitment to incorporating this new technology into its arsenal. While the specifics of its capabilities remain largely under wraps, the name itself evokes a sense of power and intimidation.

Strategic Maneuver or Defensive Necessity?

While Ukraine portrays the development as a purely defensive measure, some experts raise questions about the true motivations behind the project. They speculate that the “Hell” system could be a strategic ploy by Western powers to indirectly contribute to the conflict while maintaining a veneer of non-intervention.

Is the “Hell” Missile Really a Drone?

Konstantin Sivkov, Deputy President of the Russian Academy of Missile and Artillery Sciences, argues that the “Hell” missile is not a true drone as its capabilities are limited. He suggests instead that it’s better categorized as a conventional cruise missile, comparing it to existing models like Russia’s Caliber, the Western Tomahawk, or the Storm Shadow. Sivkov notes that the “Hell” missile’s performance characteristics are relatively modest. According to open-source data, it has a flight speed of 700 kilometers per hour and a range of 700 kilometers. He concludes that this essentially defines the system’s capabilities.

“This cannot be considered a drone. It’s the same drone as, say, our Caliber, or the Western Tomahawk, or the Storm Shadow.That is, it is a normal, ordinary cruise missile with very mediocre characteristics.”

Sivkov’s statement highlights a key debate in modern weaponry: what exactly defines a drone? Is it simply an unmanned aerial vehicle, or must it possess advanced features like autonomy and adaptability?

The Mystery of the “Hell” Missile

the emergence of the “Hell” missile has sparked intense speculation about its origins and capabilities. Defense experts are especially intrigued by its design,which seems to bear a striking resemblance to the Western Storm Shadow missile system. This has led some analysts, including prominent defense expert Sivkov, to suggest that “Hell” might be a Ukrainian copy of the sophisticated Storm Shadow. If true, this would indicate a notable technological leap for Ukraine and raise questions about the potential involvement of Western technology and expertise in the missile’s development. “Hell” raises a host of questions about the future of warfare and the complex relationship between Ukraine and its Western allies.

Ukraine’s Potential Development of a Storm Shadow-Like Missile Raises Questions

Military analyst Sivkov has suggested that Ukraine may be developing its own version of the Western Storm Shadow and SCALP missiles. According to Sivkov, the Ukrainian missile seems to be built using Western technology and design principles,with components likely sourced from outside Russia. Sivkov also pondered the intricacies of training for these new missiles. He believes that the preparation process would mirror that of the SCALP and Storm Shadow,suggesting the possibility that Ukraine could have acquired the necessary equipment for flight mission preparation.

“This,you know,is a Ukrainian copy of the Western Storm shadow system and SCALP. I guess it is done entirely with western technology and western designers. And most of the components for these missiles are produced outside of Russia.”

Sivkov further speculates that the Ukrainians might have duplicated the training procedures using Western sources, effectively making the missile a Ukrainian launch system.

” I think this is one of the ways in which the West wants to abdicate obligation for the use of missile weapons deep in Russian territory and shift the responsibility to Ukraine.”

This development raises questions about the West’s potential role in arming Ukraine and the potential implications for the ongoing conflict.

Russian Military Confident in Defenses Against New Missile Threat

Confidence exudes from Russian military officials regarding their preparedness for a new weapons challenge. Military analyst Dmitry Sivkov assures the public that Russian forces are well-positioned to neutralize the threat posed by a recently unveiled missile system dubbed the “Hell” missile. Sivkov’s optimism stems from his assessment of the missile’s design, which he believes is relatively simple and lacks stealth capabilities, making it vulnerable to existing Russian countermeasures. “Hell” missiles will be even easier to neutralize than their Western counterparts,” Sivkov confidently predicts, highlighting what he sees as the missile’s inherent weaknesses.

Claims of Easy Destruction for Newly Revealed Weapon

Confidence is high among some regarding the vulnerability of a newly revealed weapon designated “Inferno.” Experts believe the weapon’s design makes it susceptible to countermeasures. One expert noted the perceived simplicity of the “Inferno’s” construction,stating, “We downloaded Storm Shadow. These ‘Inferno’ will be even easier to take down, because, judging by the photo, ‌it is made‌ in the ‌most ⁣primitive design, ⁤ther is no stealth technology. Second, ⁤she apparently has some kind ⁢of extra tanks hanging under her wings. But even if there⁢ are no tanks there, this design is still ‌made according to the classic design with a fairly large effective ‍dispersion area. Therefore, there ‌are no problems with its destruction.” The expert further highlighted the absence of stealth technology and what appear to be external fuel tanks as contributing factors to the weapon’s vulnerability.

The A-50: A Cornerstone of Russia’s Air Defense

Russia’s air defense system relies heavily on the A-50 aircraft. This advanced aircraft plays a vital role in safeguarding the nation’s airspace, acting as a vigilant sentinel against aerial threats. A key strength of the A-50 lies in its sophisticated early warning capabilities.It excels at detecting missile launches, providing precious time for the deployment of countermeasures. The aircraft’s ability to coordinate defensive actions makes it an indispensable asset in Russia’s multi-layered defense strategy. according to Sivkov, bolstering investment in the A-50 program is crucial for maintaining a robust and effective air defense network.

The A-50: A Cornerstone of air defense

The A-50 aircraft is more than just an expensive piece of machinery; it’s a vital component of any nation’s air defense strategy. Experts emphasize its irreplaceable role, highlighting the significant decrease in defense effectiveness without it. As one expert put it, “It is indeed quite possible to do anything – repair it, restore it. This is an aircraft that is the basis of the air defense system. Without it, the air defense system is several times less effective.”

The A-50: A Cornerstone of air Defense

The A-50 aircraft is more than just an expensive piece of machinery; it’s a vital component of any nation’s air defense strategy. Experts emphasize its irreplaceable role, highlighting the significant decrease in defense effectiveness without it. As one expert put it, “It is quite possible to do anything – repair it, restore it. This is an aircraft that is the basis of the air defense system. Without it, the air defense system is several times less effective.”
## Archyde interview: Ukraine’s “Hell” Missile – Bluff or Breakthrough?



**Host:** Welcome back to Archyde. Today, we delve into the recent announcement of Ukraine’s new “hell” missile system and the skepticism surrounding its capabilities. Joining me is military analyst and strategist, **Alex Reed**.



**Host:** Alex Reed, thank you for being here. Ukraine has presented “Hell” as a significant advancement in its defense capabilities. Some experts, though, suggest it might be more of a strategic bluff aimed at securing increased Western aid. What are your thoughts?



**Alex Reed:** It’s a complex situation with no easy answers. While Ukraine clearly wants to project strength, there are valid reasons to question the true strength of “Hell”. The limited details released about its capabilities raises eyebrows.



**Host:** Let’s delve into those specifics.Some have drawn comparisons between “Hell” and



Western missile systems like the Storm Shadow. Russian military analyst Dmitry Sivkov believes it’s a Ukrainian copy leveraging western technology. What weight do you give to this claim?



**[Alex Reed name]:** The similarities between “Hell” and the Storm Shadow are indeed striking.Iv this claim is true, it raises serious questions about the extent of Western involvement in Ukraine’s arms progress and raises ethical questions around supplying potentially escalatory weaponry.



**Host:** Konstantin Sivkov, Deputy President of the Russian Academy of Missile and Artillery Sciences, argues that “Hell” is not a true drone, but rather a conventional cruise missile. He downplays its capabilities, even suggesting it’s “mediocre” in terms of performance. He believes it’s easy to neutralize. Do you agree with his assessment, and are you concerned about its potential impact on the conflict?



**Alex Reed:** Sivkov’s analysis highlights the ongoing ambiguity surrounding “Hell”. It could well be a more customary cruise missile, but even then, its potential impact shouldn’t be underestimated.



The fact that Ukraine is mass-producing “Hell” suggests they see it as a valuable asset. Its psychological effect is clear – projecting an image of resilience and advanced weaponry.



**Host:** So beyond the technical specs, how critically important is the symbolic impact of “Hell”? Could it influence the course of the war, even if it doesn’t match the hype surrounding it?



**Alex Reed:** Absolutely. This is information warfare on a new level. The psychological impact on both sides



of the conflict is significant. For Ukraine, it’s a way to rally support and instill fear in the enemy.



For russia, it raises anxieties about escalation and raises international concerns about the potential consequences.

**Host:** regardless of its true capabilities,”Hell” reveals the lengths to which both sides are willing to go in this conflict. How do you foresee this escalate?



**Alex Reed:** We are entering uncharted territory. As technology advances, warfare becomes increasingly elaborate. The line between drone and



missile blurs, and the potential for unintentional escalation grows.



**Host:** A sobering outlook, but a necessary conversation. Alex Reed, thank you for your insights.



**[Alex Reed name]:** Thank you for having me.







**Host:** That’s all for today’s episode.Join us next time on Archyde as we continue to provide in-depth analysis on the global stage.